Speshuw Fwen: Wemon am BAD mummah gibin’ Dondy SHIDDIE BABBEHS!
Mummah: Pwease no – Wemon sowwy! Wemon wub ou!
Lol gonna be honest here, this feels too tame for controversial.
Is that a bite mark or a pattern on the young fluffy?
I’m not too used to the sections, so I can move it if need be.
You’ll get more traction for sure, controversial is mainly seen and enjoyed by 15 people.
Huh, I just sort of assumed controversial was like… for anything that had any abuse in it.
Nah you can still view abuse on just image posting, the only content that belongs to controversial is enfie baby, anthro, and human on fluffy.
Well that and content like @Marakasaya1 and me.
It’s as arisen says. This is not controversial at all. Controversial is for content that you can basically classify as "have we gone too far?
Since you seem to be away at the moment, I’ll change it for you.
You and med both, ESF. Turns out you either have to be a primo edgelord, or draw an anthro, for this place to want to call it controversial.
@Fluffus @Elias @ArisenLeaf All correct. Also for politically-motivated content.
Out of ESF’s content on the site so far only this chart could be considered political, hence the tag, and even then its debateable
This almost has like… redneck vibes…?
At least he’s not accusing her for cheating with a brown stallion since coats are a bit of a dice roll to begin with. ~chuckle~
Trailer park / domestic abuse indeed.
HO ! THOSE FOALS ARE SO FUCKING CUTE *^ * littl baby deer
All art is political. It sometimes seems like it isn’t because those are the times you agree with the politics involved, or the politics involved are hegemonic and invisible.
@Fluffus Well, I mean, that statement IS true… I’d offer an alternate view and say that all art is philosophical, even anti-art but just as a philosophy of art can have a political tie-in, art itself can have a political meaning, whether its implicit, explicit, added-on, interpreted and so on.
Still, and for the sake or moderating posts, if a post does not have a huge political statement to make, or is not based on a political meme, then we don’t consider it controversial. For instance, a picture of, say,a Republican stepping on a Democrat fluffy would be considered more controversial than a man stepping on a fluffy. (and arguably, more clear in its politics)
it is? fuck. be damned the watermarks i have no idea about
I don’t blame you. Its easy to miss out on something like that. It also bugs me because it shows how art, especially really great art in the current era, has been greatly cheapened by being commodified.