let’s deal with these in order:
the stable diffusion is seeing that some pictures have signatures and thinks that that’s part of fluffies- the fact that they are nearly as Frankenstein as the fluffies themselves seems most fitting to me actually.
It is GROSSLY inappropriate for you, Pwuppy, to say what I, Grim, ‘want’ and the items you have asserted can almost trivially be dismissed.
Learning- Stable Diffusion is a very fickle program, requiring much practice, trial, and error before one can use it meaningfully. I put it to you that learning to use a program requires learning.
As for imagination and creativity-- I would assert that they are functionally the same thing in this usage case. I refer your attention to the joke I came up with for the title picture of this entire post. It seems imaginative and creative to me.
I’ll cycle back on the iterating on iterations at the end here. You clearly have MUCH to learn about emergent properties.
You have asserted that ‘no matter your ideas, all it can do is approximate’ and yet, I came up with an original joke using Ai to create the art underneath the joke text. I am referring to the title picture of this entire post. I put it to you that this assertion of yours is most demonstrably false.
Again with this disrespect to other artists argument? Is it disrespectful to paint haystacks since Monet has already done it? All of human achievement is based on improving on the works of others.
In point of fact, the only disrespect I see here is your BLAITENT disrespect for my hard work, calling it monstrous and trivializing it, as if anyone can just apropos of nothing can just up and pump it out - I would bet money that you LITERALLY could not do better Ai fluffy art if your life depended on it.
Finally, here’s SD creating art from nothing but a pone multiplying
