If you don’t know what the FUN test is, you obviously don’t know what FITCS is because you didn’t read the guide.
Is the story about fluffies no, can the story be told without fluffies yes, do the fluffies have any motives other then existing to be acted upon by the main character no.
You could a course explain how the fluffies are more then props, but that road lead you nowhere last time, go on prove the fluffies are even characters not just screams with names
Try using Gary Yamamoto if you want better bait
Jokes aside, I don’t know how you feel this is FITCS. It really couldn’t be told without fluffies.
Why not the fluffies add nothing you could replace them with any animal and the story would be the same, every plot point serves only the doctor every description is of the doctor and her thought process.
Your only defense is if it was not a fluffy I could not post here the same argument is made by every body posting fitcs. The same answer applies to your story it never belonged because it is not a story about fluffies it is a story about a human with fluffies added to be posted here
Nigga doesn’t even understand FITCS
It’s not that complicated, fluffies are only in the picture or story so you can post it here.
Go ahead prove the bare minimum that fluffies are intrigual to the story, show that substituting the fluffies changes any thing about the story, show your work lord fluffy
You can keep saying “you could replace the fluffy with an animal” but that doesn’t make it a valid argument.
It has to be a fluffy. This story could not be told in this same way using any creature other than a fluffy.
You keep saying you can’t replace the fluffy but conveniently never bother to prove it, I have pointed out how the doctor is the main character further is the only true character. The fluffies have no motive agency or even character, they are just there to be acted on by the doctor.
Go ahead prove that the fluffies are more then props to allow you to post your story here, I will not hold my breath for your only fluffies can talk so that means only fluffies work in the story or else I could not post it here
I’ve given you plenty of reasons why fluffies can’t be replaced but guess what you keep doing? Going “uhh nuh uh” and ignoring it.
The fluffies are helpless in a way completely unique from any other creature. They can vocalize what they are feeling, what they need, what scares them. Animals can’t do that. But they can’t effectively stand against a human, like another human could.
A fluffy can express its own agony without any possible recourse towards its tormentor.
Let’s stop the discussion here. Za has answered your question and there is no point arguing further.
Draw a comic about a doctor kick a fluffy in one throw away panel the fluffy speaks why hurt fluffy and now it is not fitcs that is your limp argument.
You can replace the fluffy with any talking animal and absolutely nothing would change in your story except your excuse for posting your story here
Yes there is this is not a fluffy story it is a story of a doctor, you know it to be those za knows it the only reason it is allowed is because za wrote it
It’s a story about a fluffy doctor. If you want to know more about the fluffies in the story then by all means ask, but the argument is done and if you don’t drop it you can take a break from the site.
If I need to ask about the fluffies that means the fluffies are not important to the story, I do not need to ask any information about the doctor there is a whole story that explains her motives, you have allowed za to push people over none fluffy content but now that za is posting none fluffy content it is to sacred to discuss
Za is allowed to make criticisms, as are you. You’re not being reprimanded for your opinion, you’re being reprimanded for drawing out the argument when you’ve been told to stop. Take a week off.