I am not beholden to your terrible bait
1 Like
You are beholden to not write about a fluffy but pretending the story is about a fluffy because there is a fluffy in it
Reminder a pic is not a rebuttal whatâs next a eye roll emote
Sadly you are not even trying to accept criticism, doubly sad for a man who has stated a wish to elevate the content posted to this website
What more valid criticism can there be then your story is not a fluffy story but a story about a dentist that has fluffies in it, you have totally failed to even engage with the criticism
Crazy Frog? Donât be ridiculous!
Theyâre chinchillas
1 Like
I told you exactly why it has to be a fluffy
No creature could replace this fluffy
React like it
Hurt like it
Nothing else can fill the space this fluffy occupies
It must be a fluffy
This fluffy in this circumstance
1 Like
Again you do not engage with the criticism that the story is not about a fluffy but a story about a dentist, making the claim that a fluffy must be involved inconsequential to the critic
The story is about multiple fluffies
The human is just a plot device driving the fluffies to their torment
Or, if you insist that the human is the true main character, the plot is that the fluffies are driving the humanâs plot and therefore are still main characters to the story
1 Like
Imagine arguing with Mcgee
1 Like
I forgot to attach a bait image to that last reply I have to end my life
1 Like
No unfortunately it is not the dentist drives the story it is his actions that move the story forward his emotions through which we experience reality, cornpop is just a name of a fluffy whoâs only relevance is his contact with the dentist.
Even the ending is of the dentist how he feels and what actions he took the fluffy is just a spent prop with no introspective of how the story affected him out side of itâs pain which only matters because of how it effects the dentist
Yeah because this story is about how the fluffy impacts the human
Which doesnât qualify as FITCS
I explained as much in the FITCS guide
I coined the term I know what Iâm talking about
1 Like
No the story is how the dentist is effected by his actions, the fluffy could be replaced by any squealing animal and the only things that would change is what noises are made and your pretenses that this is a fluffy story.
To prove my point explain how changing the fluffy to a different animal changes the story not how it effects your ability to post it here
No, you canât write about abusing animals here and thank god for that. Even if you could, nothing could verbalize or express its reaction to such events as well as a fluffy (short of a human, which is also not allowed, and again thank god)
As I thought you have no response but to appeal to animal abuse is not allowed, what great plot was added by nuuuu hurt fluffy that could not be communicated by a animals anguished cries, and please do not hide behind you canât write about animal abuse actually articulate what plot was explored by it being specifically fluffies cries of torment
Have you even read the other chapters