The feud would’ve still been there if the neighbour didn’t kill the fluffy and if it does escalate to the point where the owner is throwing things into the garden to intentionally cause damage to the vegetables then the neighbour will 100% be pressing charges for damage to property.
No dead Fluffy results in “I’ll pay for the damages, now apologize Bluey”.
Dead Fluffy is a box of hornets in the mailbox, piss in the car gas tank, and an expired jar of mayo left in the garden.
1 Like
Which would most likely be followed by a police investigation regarding actions with intent to cause injury or destruction of property.
Which means a report gets filed and nothing ever comes of it.
1 Like
It’s the fluffy owner’s fault. He spoiled his fluffy, letting it get away with a lot of things, so the fluffy thought all it needs to do to get out of trouble was to make a cute face, little did it know that doesn’t work on every human. Plus the Fluffy didn’t have a collar so the garner thought it was just a feral.
5 Likes
Kill it ! kill it MORE !!!
1 Like
the fluffy owner owns him a new garden
2 Likes
THE MASTERS OF THE SKILLS OF CUTENESS ARE NO MACH FOR THE EXPERIENCED ELDERLY OF THE HUMAN RACE!
2 Likes
For real? I’d imagine it be like puppies, they cost more than adult dogs cuz there’s room for quick medical procedures and training… its easier to spayneutering a chirpie and training them compared to an adult imo
Fluffies go from that delicate care stage to adults really quick. Not much room between the two.
1 Like