All Your Fluffy Questions

Community Posts
306

1: There are probably some people who want to depict racism in their fluffy stories. But they’re not particularly common.

2: A lot of people attribute their desire to abuse fluffies to a sort of “cuteness aggression”.
Other people seem to be working through their own trauma with their fluffy stories.
There’s not an “official reason” apart from “They’re there, and I want to tell this story”

3: Fluffies did start out as an offshoot of MLP, specifically from the FiM fandom (Bronies/Pegasisters)
From the old-time members who have come and given their accounts on the early days, it would seem that the idea began with the Bronies, but because it was based at 4chan it had a lot of chan influence, such as;

4: Fluffies were becoming popular at the same point as greentext stories that mentioned “mom’s spaghetti” falling out of people’s pockets. (Chan culture)
Eventually it was explained away as a simple and cheap meal that could be marketed by Hasbio and then prepared by young children for their fluffies without much/any adult supervision

5: Smarties/Hellgremlins are an invention that allows people to feel better about abusing fluffies.
Originally “Smarty-friends” were just herd leaders that were slightly more intelligent than the average fluffy. But it evolved into a trope that allowed people to justify abuse.
Some people call it a syndrome, some people call it a result of being feral for too long, some people say it’s irreversible, some people say it’s just a state of mind. That’s all a matter of headcanon.

6: Yes, the fluffy fandom wiki is a reliable source of lore, though it is not controlled by fluffy-community in any way.

7: Headcanons are how we explain away minor differences in how people see and depict their fluffies. It allows hundreds of conflicting ideas to coexist in a single space with fewer arguments than one could expect if we tried to pin the lore down and say “Your fluffy must act like this”

8: How big do you want them to be? What’s right for your stories?
Most people depict them as being between the size of a medium cat up to the size of a medium dog

9: They can be ANY color.

1 Like
307

Are Fluffygirls human enough not to be able to do abuse on?

308

You should probably ask that somewhere that they’re wanted

edit: Okay, that sounded more rude in text than I had intended it to be

1 Like
309

No worries!

But is it a yes or a no?

310

They’re not fluffies
Don’t abuse them here

1 Like
311

YES!!!
My girls are SAFE!!!

312

Is it fluffy community or fluffycommunity?

313

Yes

1 Like
314

:skippy1:
.

315

hey guys, i was thinking about some aspects of my headcanon and I was wondering how you guys approach certain aspects of fluffy lore:

  • Do stallions care about their foals? I like to imagine that domesticated ones do so as to protect their family friendly image, but strays prioritise it far less

  • Generally, how long ago did the fluffy population boom happen?

  • In the fluffy universe, do Hasbro and MLP exist, or is it more of an alternate timeline thing where Hasbio took their place?

  • What do the general population think about fluffies? I imagine even years since the initial “outbreak” of strays, they have been considered an invasive species, disrupting the natural order of things, i’d say its still a mixed bag, with the average, moderate person probably fond of fluffies as pets, but dont really care about what happens to strays

  • What do fluffies think about children? Do they hold them to different standards than that of adult humans? I imagine generally not that much.