BABF: Mantis Foal (Viscera)

Mantis Foal is a pegasus foetal anomaly characterised by overdeveloped wings and underdeveloped or absent fore-hooves.

In rare cases, the foetus may develop two sets of wings, but these instances are more likely to be still born. Those that survive birth tend to suffer from more co-morbid deformities than the more common variant.

Typically a Mantis Foal, if spared from a postpartum abortion by their mother, will not survive longer than a year regardless of care and human support. The malformation of the limbs also deforms the thorax in a way similar to swimmer syndrome in dogs.

Without surgical correction the foal experiences a severely limited lung capacity, difficulty feeding, and a number of other complications that eventually causes the foal to expire due to the additional stress on their cardiovascular system.

The complexity of these surgical corrections and the more fragile nature of the foals affected by it, mean that most breeders, shelters, and owners cannot, or will not invest in it.

The longest lived Mantis Foal ever recorded is currently 2 years old, due to being owned by a veterinary surgeon willing to experiment with the surgical correction for the sake of practice.

The subject, named Griff, was also neutered so as not to test if he would pass his deformities to his own offspring.

The ethics of attempting to breed a fluffy with such a severe physical anomaly aside. Due to their usually short lifespans, most Mantis Foals do not reach a breeding age. Those that do, generally do not survive attempting to carry foals.

Tests using semen to inseminate a healthy mare resulted in a disproportionate likelihood of still births and additional limb malformations regardless of the typing of the mare chosen. Unlike the breeding mares who are usually found to produce Mantis Foals.

The biggest risk factor for Mantis Foal is usually pegasi to pegasi breeding involving larger than average wingspans, as the first instance of these foals being created in any kind of numbers originated with a hobbyist breeding project for large winged pegasi.

If a breeder becomes aware one of their mares is creating Mantis Foals, it is recommended to exclusively breed them to unicorn or earthie stalions. While there is still risk of the deformity being created, the rate will be significantly reduced compared to continuing to breed them with pegasus or alicorn stallions.

Some testing suggests that the numbers produced by alicorns may be influenced by the parentage of the alicorn, however the research is limited due to most data being reports from hobby breeders with obvious ethical objects to intentionally risking additional Mantis Foal creation or limited funds to pursue significant genetic testing that would accurately record the variables in the data set.

For the purposes of the Breed A Better Fluffy project: Trait based line breeding is a risky undertaking due to the nature of chimera DNA. Attempts to branch too far in any particular direction is prone to unintended consequences.

As BABF is a hobbyist project with limited funds and materials, it’s recommended to both make trades with other hobbyist projects with different focuses and to routinely breed project lines back to standard lines for both genetic diversity and to combat destabilisation of the fluffy genome.

By discussing issues like this one we can continue to Breed A Better Fluffy!

53 Likes

This is amazing.

10 Likes

this is really interesting!

This is a very intriguing concept. I like that you wrote it from the point of view of someone who actually wants to improve fluffy quality of life and breeding,while at the same time keeping a more scientific and detached voice.
I can’t imagine non-ethical or backyard breeders would heed this advice often,though. I think some would try to,unfortunately, breed it into a passable fluffy so they can sell a bipedal fluffy with velociraptor wings. Griff’s design is great.

Homeotic transformations babeyyyy! I’m literally studying this at uni, this is so cool :^]
Where did you get the idea from?

My premises with the BABF was like, a bunch of people who would do stuff like retro pugs, doll-faced persians and mops, happening to zero in on fluffies as a “breed to improve.”

So you get a small forum of dedicated hobby breeders who genuinely love fluffies and want them to be happy and healthy but are encountering the wild world of just how much you can fuck up a fluffy by trying to make them better. (There is absolutely the odd weirdo hanging out there going weird places with this.)

Meanwhile in the rest of the world where people do not give a fuck or try to know much about fluffies. There probably are people absolutely trying to exploit the defect. The biggest hurdle of course being: they die super easily and quickly. So I imagine 80% of the time they’re an accident and someone trying to recoup their losses. Since a for profit breeder trying for it on purpose has to fight the rate of still birth, the inability to feed properly, and the inability to breathe properly and hope it lives long enough to trick someone into buying it because like hell are they shelling out for surgery themselves. (Though there’s probably some less than qualified people trying to get the hang of doing this in their kitchen to appropriately horrific results.)

My initial thought process was like a combo of: “how much do you have to fuck with DNA to make a mammal with six limbs?” and a vague memory of a science article skimmed years ago about breeding chimeras irl being illegal for fear of creating a human foetus inside an animal.

Throw in that in real life humans are absolutely god awful about selecting traits to exaggerate in animals, horses and dog breeding being the obvious references.

So fluffies, being a barely functional chimera held together with hubris and duct tape, put to the same rigors just start falling apart under the pressure. Once the chimera loses the barely functional balance it has, things start getting really weird as its fucked up dna tries to express things it wasn’t meant to or forgets shit it actually needed to function. (to put it as loosely and unscientifically as possible)