On that side, yes. But a depressed animal may not even attract the attention of a possible adopter. And if said person was looking for a black one, they might not buy anything at all, thus losing the sell.
It also may drop the morale of a litter, causing widespread depression and even wan-die loops in such young and impressionable minds.
Also a bad review from someone who rescues said foal (I would do so in a heartbeat, at least) can drop your ratings
All the more reason to be a dick to all fluffies and see which ones break. Happy ones go to the sales floor, sad ones become litter pals, milkbags, or animal feed.
Donāt want a regular fluffy having a one off bad day and someone giving you a poor review for it. Better to ensure that the customers only see the stock that will ALWAYS be happy, even if the other foals are bullying it or wonāt share toys with it.
Isnāt it less of a hassle at that point to be decent to your stock, only relegating the bad apples to said roles? That way, you have access to a wider stock. If they arenāt the ātoughestā of the bunch, it doesnāt matter once you sold them. Nothing incredible, just⦠humanity? Besides, a temper tantrum is one thing, a depressed being is way different.
Also, a fluffy recanting tales of sad friends/brothers going forever sleepies might also make following purchases happen in a better place. A foal talking about how they were treated might also elicit extreme responses from moreā¦extreme individuals (see dog trainer getting his house burned down because he was found out to abuse dogs into compliance). Whereas a fluffy mentioning a fair treatment might encourage getting a companion from the same place, maybe hoping to reunite a family or something.
Beyond that, it seems any fluffy related activity is ran by psychopaths, some sane people pl0x.
No. Simply because this is @Tyndalo8825 's headcanon. Itās a headcanon where (correct me if Iām wrong, Tyndalo) fluffies are near worthless, money is made on the sale of fluffy food, accessories, and toys, not the fluffies themselves.
Verbally abusing a poor colored, one-eyed foal that no one would buy anyway is no big deal. Make more money selling it as a litter pal or milkbag than selling it as a pet. And breaking itās spirits isnāt gonna affect itās worth as a litter pal.
Breaking a high markup fluffy toy because youāre mad that a foal has poor colors would be stupid. Thatās worth something.
Sorry for being so annoying. Itās just cross-box criticism irks me. Itād be like if I went into hugbox comics and started claiming that the happy feral family in the wooded glen is doomed die from predators, or the elements, or humans finding them.
Itās clearly marked as hugbox so my negative comments would be off topic at best and trollish or insulting at worst.
Again, sorry for being annoying about it, itās just a pet peeve of mine. Had a lot of hugboxers on Reddit telling me I was wrong in nearly all my posts until the sub created a new rule. It got tiresome. But I hope weāre good. No hard feelings
I find if you have opinions that clash with the piece and creatorās usual style? Maybe just comment on the art or execution. It works well for me. Mind you: Iām a hug boxer that does take in abuse and other things. So Iāve commented on how well the creator pulls on my heart strings or how effective their story telling is, etc.
There are some folks I will joke around with, but I think thatās due to mutual understanding and appreciation of work. Iām looking forward to @OtherCoraline ripping out my heart later on, for instance. Or @Bad_Roomie doing something thatās insanely cute while equally horrible. Maybe @RQ dragging me through some experience in hope I get to see tummy rubs. Or the emotional roller coaster that is @artist-kun.
What? No, of course not. You actually gave me a piece of information I couldnāt have alone, thatās useful stuff mah boi. It gives context to the artwork. It makes it enjoyable for me to know the basics behind an artistās work. If he bases his work in a setting that had odds stacked against fluffies, thereās no point in going over morality issues, as the headcanon follows its own rules. As you might have guessed, I place a LOT of importance on a piece of work being coherent with itself. With such premises, it flows perfectly, and I can appreciate it.
No problems if you want to use that foal in a project you have in mind I like to see the fanart
@PhobicNova I also like black colors and their dark scales but in fluffyland they are hated XD
@OtherCoraline Thanks that means a lot to me, that something I do likes or even that it can be hated since that tells me that I can transmit emotions in others.
As for my headcannon indeed they are useless since being a mistake caused by the human being to generate profits to a transnaccional company (long live capitalismo lol), any profit that can be made from items for those Bio toys will be more important than the main product
Very interesting visual design. Black foals are supposed to be huge money, but youāve distinctly picked an off-black color. Put that next to an actual jet black fluffy and your edgelord teen or fashionista wannabe is gonna despise the thought of going for the ābudgetā option. So close, but yet so far, tiny fluffy.
Iād call it a āWarm Grayā. Iām not at work so I donāt have a Pantone book with me, but itās definitely a warm gray. An Edgelord or fashionista would want a āCool Grayā, a cool black, or a rich black (highly saturated). Just black by itself is a bit weak, IMO.
Wait hold up is that a Solid Black fluffy?!?! I take that over any other fluff any day! I love solid black animals if he had some white on him you could make him like a husky.