Extra Log: It’s kinda surprising how Breeze got bloated with milk in so little time, she is now a fat babbeh unlike Cocoa, which is the smallest and skinniest of them all. The punishment wasn’t enough for Breeze, let’s wait to see what our superiors will tell us.
Note to Staff: Hello, this is Doctor Jeremiah Evergreen. I’m seeing what’s happening in this experiment and how it’s getting worse. So, as I brought you the mare and the foals, you have my permission to rip Breeze’s tongue off and still punish it even more. If it doesn’t work, keep punishing. If any of the foals die before day 10 and it’s because of her, kill her too or let the mare kill it, as the psychological toll the experiment is taking on her will surely do it.
(If you want to question something, I’ll answer as Doctor Evergreen in these posts)
Question: Isn’t ripping the tongue out extreme? I’m by no mean trying to protect Breeze, she deserves what’s coming to her, but if the experiment is to test how long it takes for a feral mare to break mentally, wouldn’t Breeze keeping her tongue and being tortured in a different yet brutal method have a better result, due to Breeze still being able to speak and thus potential begging for her “mummah” to save her?
My dear friend, at this point, with what I saw in the logs, she didn’t mention her mummah once, and she would’ve called for her when she first opened her eyes and before the abuse, so in my opinion ripping her tongue out just enough for her to be mute should be enough to make Breeze calm down at once.
If not, we’ll have to result to termination or pillowing.
Question: Wouldn’t taking one of her legs be a more appropriate method? physical appearance means everything to fluffies, so theoretically taking one of Breeze’s limbs or another part like her tail or an ear would have a better effect than taking her tongue
Understood, you’re correct that she nor the other (from what I can remember) haven’t asked for their “mummah”, thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
We will resort to this if the tongue ripped out doesn’t solve her behavior. We will start on the front legs if she continues hitting her brother. She can misbehave all she wants, but she can’t stay in the way of the experiment or interfere. Orders from the higher ups.
Besides the whole foals thing, the mother is kind of an extra weight more then anything. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to get rid of her and keep the tests on the foals only? Mainly asking as she’s more a waste of time/money.
If you don’t mind some ideas: Why not, if ya want the mother take some part of this, to invert the glass to have the goals see her and she can’t see them? Side thing, make it sound proof, may as well make it more impactful.
She kept crying during and 4 hours after the removal of her horn. She didn’t care about her siblings drinking milk during this time, however as soon as she recovered she continued the abuses.
My my, it is a nice idea, my friend. I will ask the employees to change the side of the glass immediately before next day arrived. The mare will surely be in panic after being unable to see them, I can guarantee, but let’s just wait and see the reaction of the foals.
And answering your first question, she is needed as we also want to see what will happen to both the foals and the mare when they feed after 10 days separated, mainly the mare, as her udders are getting bigger and more painful.
With regard to your ongoing experiment labelled ‘Worst Times’, may I offer an alternate suggestion for punishment? The use of an elastic band around both forelegs or some other restraining method, for example a collar and anchored leash with limited range, may be more conducive to your experimental goals.
The issue, as observed, is that the yellow foal subject (‘Breeze’), is attacking the other foals, therefore preventing her from doing that should be the focus in my opinion, rather than attempting to curb the undesirable behaviour via the standard discipling methods utilised thus far.
Restraining ‘Breeze’ suitably achieves the goal of preventing her attacking the other foals; doing so in a reversible manner also gives a good behaviour incentive of returning her freedom, in the unlikely event of her incipient smarty behaviour improving.
In my opinion, proceeding straight to quadriplegia aka ‘pillowing’, while undoubtedly effective, is also irreversible, which may permanently bias the results of the study. Restraining her leaves the option for escalation to amputation in the event that the subject’s behaviour fails to improve.
In summary: Tie the bitch up first, hack her legs off later.
Good point, my friend. That’s a pretty good alternative to pillowing, I will tell the staff to see the suggestion and do it. This way, the poopie will feel safer to feed and so will the ‘Aqua’, and with or without the tongue Breeze wouldn’t be able to do anything, just throw threats.
As for the mare, she will feel more relaxed by it, just a little as her udders will keep growing and causing her pain until the end of the experiment.
