Speaking as somebody familiar with the faith, whatever decision the Catholic Church makes on fluffies would depend on the Pope. Speaking from a point of ethics I feel that the issue is with the creator playing God, and not the Creation itself.
In addition, I know the Church is hard on human genetic engineering, but not animal engineering, so a potentially more eco-Pope with a focus on eco-ethics could promote better care and development of fluffies.
I could see the liberal congregations doing that and maybe the crazier Evangelicals but Catholics would be a HARD no same with most Muslims outside of the West. If itâs a head cannon where they have Human DNA (stupid concept really since everything shares DNA hell we share 90% of ours with slugs) used in the creation thatâs gonna be a no for anything but the most liberal of churches and religions
That sounds like a way to get some Vatican 2 tier controversy if the Pope at the time isnât careful
The church will get divided on this, that is the only thing I can be sure about
Vatican 2 did lead to a better understanding of the gospel among the laity. Conservative as the Church can be, it does try to adapt to its times, a reason why it has endured so long.
I do agree with you that the Church would be a hard no on fluffies with human DNA, but I can see them being more lenient if fluffies are engineered without a human origin.
A fluffy is a long way from simple genetic engineering we are familiar whit and it would be out right seen as a mockery of god at best they would be seen as abomination
The average man may be ambivalent but the actual church would not be so lenient they would have nothing good to say about fluffies
Aww, this is sweet
Try to see it more as a primitive, primal conception of a god, like Zeus or Tengri. The being you identify with the thing thatâs bigger than everything, and encompasses all of it.
As in âSky Daddehâ or âInvisible Man in the Sky/Cloudsâ?
Iâm just saying, itâs not the inherently ridiculous conception of divinity it might at first seem.