I gotta agree with you here. Most people here talk about disabled fluffies in a way which makes me worry for the disabled humans in their lives.
1 Like
She also does not like smarties but i can see how that can come across as said dude not the intention.
1 Like
I don’t care what the intention was, what you said is still the equivalent of “I think both rapists and Down syndrome kids deserve gruesome deaths”.
Oh ffs. Fluffies =/= real animals. Fluffies =/= humans. Writing about something here does not express a world view that relates to either of those two things. Pretty fuckin’ sure a lot of us wouldn’t condone rape but there’s a bunch of it in stories! I get where you are coming from but when it’s been made pretty clear that what you are saying was not the intent, maybe chill the fuck out.
4 Likes
People who think like this remind me of the people who said that violent video games make you violent,it’s not a rule of 2,just because you enjoy violent content doesn’t indicate that you would apply it in real life,most people here love stories of fluffie suffering but despise any instances of its equivalent in animals or people.
2 Likes
Thankyou
1 Like
I shall be happily looking forward to these Sensitive Babies Demise!
I do got to wander, did someone send Holly these sensitive Babies to spite her, or thinking they would be cared for?
Either way, all Sensitive Babies deserve to die for existing.
I can’t get enough of foals in diapers.
Ew indeed, ew indeed
1 Like
It is not so much a matter of whether Ms. Farms is perfect, but how one defines an Abuser.
In the setting, her description would be quite satisfactory. But most fluffyverses are ones in which Abuse is to a degree normalised, starting with Hasbio™ creating the awful things.
In reality, an Abuser is someone who abuses fluffies. Ms. Farms is merely an occasional Abuser, much in the manner that serial killers are occasional murderers.
This is incorrect and goes against the Holly Farms canon also her last name isn’t farms.
She lives on a farm and is named Holly.
Also I would kindly ask you respect the fact she is hugboxer whose not a perfect human being
Thanks for explaining the title pun.
But to iterate, the issue here is not your characters character. It is the use of the term Hugboxer.
it seem simple enough, saddly it doesn’t explain why holly hates SBS Fluffies since they technically are the opposite of smarties in behaviour.
but that’s just me, i guess.
Answer is complicated its meant to be part of her character but she just did not like SBS foals and fluffies to begin with.
Fluffies are already a lot of work as are other pets but one that will forever be a baby and need extra special care does not help.
As a TV personality and breeder that extra care can be difficult.
But that is why she does not want them personally you know? Not why she actively hates them