Poor thing she was just upset about her baby.
Is there going to be a part 3 is my question.
Though the sorry poopies does mean she deserves the toss.
I always find it odd that fluffies are treated as toys not pets so abusing them is ok but the fluffy biting back like mishandling a toy can hurt you is not.
Also oh no poor Butter’s kids they are so cute!
I’m with Butter on this one, holy shit that girl did not get spanked enough, if my mom bought me a new toy and I immediately broke it, well dear god am I glad I never did.
Break the kid’s fingers, break the dad’s leg. If people IRL can get attached to their Roombas and get them repaired instead of replaced, there’s no excuse for not respecting something that talks back. Conscious abuse is preferable to solipsism.
Animals are still being killed for unjustified reasons and abused in factory farms, testing labs, mills, and other things (like bull fights and circuses which still exist in some countries). All of these disgustingly inhumane practices are legal in many places.
But they are recognized as not being mere objects. Including by the major world religions. Cartesian dualism ( that considers animals mere machines, simulating sensation & emotion ) is a comparatively isolated position.
There is a reason fluffies being legally classed as biotoys, rather than animals ( or vegetables, even ) matters.
Kids are recognised as being sapient too and that often doesn’t help: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/child-rights/ I talk a big game about wanting to hit the fictional kid for being an annoying little snot here, but I never would IRL, and I’m horrified that real kids’ rights are being trampled left and right worldwide and people just don’t care. I think kids may be the second most oppressed group on the planet, and disabled people only beat them out because at some point everyone stops being a kid.
And adolescents need to be recognized as being between children and adults, not stupidly divided between both groups.
A consensual relationship between a 16-17 year old and an 18-19 year old should never be illegal. Meanwhile, some 40 year old freak shouldn’t be allowed with any of them.
At the very least, the age of majority needs to be raised to 25 or at least 20.
Yep. The people who campaign hardest for the punishments for that are always the people who don’t give a fuck that in parts of the US it’s still legal for adults to marry eight-year-olds.
Oh, children have quite a few rights. The issue is that they are dependent on us adults to uphold them.
Fluffies, to drag things Abusively back on subject, ought to be legally classed as human children, in most descriptions. Including a degree of autonomy we do not recognize in other animals.
That’s a lot of comments. Fluffering is a master of using the angle of ignorant, cold humans seeing fluffies as exactly what they are labeled and sold as. “Biotoys.”
The best fluffy art and comics exploit either
the inability of fluffies to assimilate into nature that evolved independent of them resulting in them being completely defenseless and/or unfit parents.
Or humans or other fluffies being too selfish to care about their suffering, or the general cruel indifference of life itself. Gotta love a foal-in-a-can slowly dying and being crushed by its own body growing inside the tiny only home it’s ever known in a vending machine that was abandoned.
They are the ultimate cruel joke of the universe. Bravo.
I have never wanted to see fluffies suffer like I do with @LongFluffering’s. There’s some sort of evil magic in your art that sends me to the abuse end of the spectrum at high speed.
Dumbest take of all. You know why? Fluffies aren’t real. And the fictional version of them have always been biotoys. The suffering is why fluffies exist in the fictional world.
I think anyone who wants humans killed over fictional ponies may be a little to sensitive to be online. Do your parents know you’re looking at fluffy torture!?