I would say your anthros are recognizable as fluffies
2 Likes
Are there any examples of anthros that didnt count as fluffies and were bsically just fursonas (not that theres anything wrong with that, jerry)
1 Like
SO MANY. Some creators see a ready-made small community where they can gain quick notoriety so they slap the word “fluffy” on their oh so cool and edgy furry character, make them drop an L or an R here and there, and call it a day.
And there’s plenty wrong with that, Newman
5 Likes
I mean im not gonna judge someone for being a furry, but own it, you know? Theres plenty of dedicated places to upload furry art, not that i would know anything about that. I gt it being anoying for the ourpoes of FLUFFYcommunity though
4 Likes
@ArisenLeaf
Sorry I didn’t mention you or your epic anthro-work, but I didn’t want to speak for you.
1 Like
Alright, barring any unforeseen edits from this point forward, we currently believe Rule 6 will read:
6: No Pornography - Since “pornography” is a very broad term that can be construed in a number of ways, it is defined hereafter as photographs or videos of human beings wearing so little clothing that they would be arrested for being seen thusly clothed on most public beaches in the United States.
Furthermore, artwork and stories that are made for the sole purpose of being porn are not allowed on this site and will be removed.
Posts that violate this rule include, but are not limited to:
Nude pinup art
Sexual activity that is not in service to a story or joke
Blatant Fetish art
16 Likes
There is another rule that we are looking at editing, but if we do choose to edit this one it will actually loosen some restrictions on storytelling, so the changes we propose there shouldn’t negatively effect anyone.
4 Likes
Well that seems more than reasonable. Glad things that are in service to stories will be unaffected.
5 Likes
What happened to the grandfather clause? So much art has been deleted.
1 Like
Which works were you wanting to be exceptions?
We’re still debating what needs to be removed.
What grandfather clause? Where’d you get that idea?
1 Like
Virgil’s comment that I replied to: “No, nono we are NOT deleting most anthros. There is a Grandfather clause with an endpoint of today. We will retain nearly all of the anthro art that has been posted to our site, to this point
But going forward we will have different guidelines”
It’s fine.
In order for anthro-fluffies to continue as a subspecies the porn should be removed.
Like the mods said, keep it about fluffies, not pornography.
4 Likes
I guess I was just confused, I thought your comment I replied to meant that anthro works posted prior to the rule change would be grandfathered in and would not be removed.
So Fluffies should look like Fluffies and AI art isn’t allowed. Pogg
1 Like
I’m a little worried about one of the subspecies I created, at least these look fluffy enough that I can continue with them
The new rules are about:
12: Anthro fluffies should look like anthro fluffies and not some furry horses, and their behavior should be somewhat fluffy-like.
13: No AI content.
Neither of these apply to your non-anthro sub-species.
4 Likes
I believe I misspoke and made it seem like nothing made before that day would be removed. I apologize for the confusion my wording caused
4 Likes
I know I’m tardy to the party but are we talking about the one that drove Air away or did the dumbass make ANOTHER one