That would make sense, although Buffalo and the domestic cow are two different mammals.
1 Like
Fluffies are pretty much, what has science done, though
2 Likes
fair, you got a point, lol
True but the standard mish mash that is fluffies tends to be the base that they then splice stuff into that wasnt part of the standard forumla as they attempt to overtake additional markets and maintain relevancy by introducing new lines etc.
ex: Fluffy + Cow = Uddered fluffy, slighty bigger and useful for more milk/meat.
Fluffy + Buffalo = Same ^ but even bigger but not particularly domesticated and allowed to roam free as a novelty due to buffalo extinction in some fluffy headcannon.
1 Like
Yup.
I do kitsune fluffies remember ( no not like that ew )
I got a whole lot of lore for them.
A fluffy is the base and then bolt things on them and go oh god what has science done ?!
Followed by, who can we market this too.
1 Like
thinking about the bufalo extinction headcannon, i kind of like the idea that people are slowly replacing species with fluffies bred to be similar to them as they go extinct. whatre the chances we get a fluffy Jurassic park?
Fluffysourus
fluffaraptor
1 Like
probably doesn’t help that there isn’t a ‘cow fluffy’ tag but there is a ‘fluffalo’ so people probably label one with the other since its close enough.
There’s quite a few good fluffy raptor images if you use the search. 
I have laughed quite a bit at the ‘derprassic park’ esque looking fluffy dinosaurs.
1 Like
yeah
1 Like
that. is. amazing.
this is a wonderful discovery. I’m gonna deep dive into that laterto see how much I can find on it.
1 Like
Lots of good work on munchkins fluffies.