That looks delicious!
My headcanon is that as opposed to real animals causing them intense pain before theyâre eaten makes fluffies taste even better.
6 Likes
WTF why was it flagged?
8 Likes
Honestly,I donât know.
7 Likes
UmâŚwhatâs with the hidden posts?
1 Like
1984
4 Likes
lol this being flagged makes no sense.
1 Like
Wait did qwerty report this for being a shitedit of his latest post? Shitedits are allowedâŚ
On a side note, its very impressive that you can make art of this quality so quickly. Took you only a few hours to make this since qwertyâs post.
4 Likes
(post deleted by author)
welp they mad,flagged it within minutes I post this
so I change some details and post another comic with mostly the same pic
Took out the first pic then draw another first pic,so the context is different.
itâs called âstuffedâ if you want to see the comic
if anyone want the original one,they can just dm me
5 Likes
Damn, Qwerty, he didnât even use your own characters. What the fuck is wrong with you, man?
3 Likes
Shitedits are not allowed without permission from the Original Creator.
Rule 7 in the Site Rules; âAbuse of certain categories of characters is prohibited. This includes youthful anthropomorphic fluffies, other creatorsâ fluffy or human OCs if done without permission, or non-fluffy animals.â
If a Shitedit is created without permission, but the Original Creator chooses not to flag the content, then this can be seen as permission after the fact but it is up to the original creator if they wish to flag the edit or not.
In this case, yellowcottoncandy030 did not ask for permission to make an Edit and qwertytf chose to flag the Edit based on their work.
8 Likes
Isnât that rule limited to the characters only and not the environment? The fluffies in both qwertyâs and yellowcottoncandyâs posts are just placeholders and the focus is on the tator tots.
This post was obviously a parody of qwertyâs but am I just not allowed to ever make art of fluffies eating tator tots in the way they both drew it without consulting the original artist?
2 Likes
It is admittedly a greyer area once the colours were changed, but since only the colours were changed it was still deemed close enough to being a parody of qwertytfâs work.
Had yellowcotoncandy not posted the original shitedit and instead started with the different colours then the argument of environments couldâve come into it, potentially inspired by qwertytfâs art without being a direct variant of it.
4 Likes
We still have the problem of whether an artist is entitled to the overarching idea of their post. Artists absolutely should have complete control over their OC, but what about the story that goes along with them.
Itâs difficult to cede the rights to an idea solely due to a 1-page post that an artist made. Itâs much easier to give full control of an idea/story when dealing with multi-page comics. For example, the story that RQ told of Marble is complex enough that the story is hard to take inspiration from without being a carbon copy, and is thus its own unique story that people can refer to by name over description.
But for posts that didnât have the same amount of thought put into them as full comics, a 1-page post of an idea is small enough that attempts to âcopyrightâ the idea seem predatory. In my eyes, itâs like trying to copyright words and catchphrases, and can limit creative output of the community.
4 Likes
Again the issue isnât that yellowcottoncandy posted art about a Fluffy eating a tater tot, it was that they posted a shitedit of qwerytfâs work, then posted the same shitedit with a new coat of paint.
Inspiration is fine, and parody is ok so long as permission is granted. But the deciding factor in this case was that the new parody was posted so close to the original parody that it was still under the umbrella of an unsanctioned shitedit.
Honestly thereâs no âone size fits allâ rule regarding this and there is arguments on both sides about why the amended parody should and shouldnât be allowed. In the end itâll come down to personal decision and as the mod who made that decision I felt it just crossed the line, again due to how close it was to the original shitedit.
7 Likes
At first I thought there mightâve been someone going around commissioning pictures of tater tots and I had a good idea who