No, I don’t mean do they eat meat, since they eat everything. I mean would they be considered vegan since they’re not considered animals in most headcanon? What does everyone think?
0 voters
i go with not vegan, since part of the whole vegan mindset, far as i know, is about the cruelty taken towards the process of aquiring the food, and considering what half of this fandom is about then lol
I’m skeptical of the “animal suffering” criteria after seeing “vegan cats” where so-called animal lovers force their cats to go through horrendous suffering in the name of veganism.
Boring answer: No.
Fun answer: Yes, because it’s funny.
Alternate fun answer: Yes, because they have the ability to consent to being used and therefore cannot be exploited.
Another point of discussion. Is synthetic meat (i.e. lab-grown) vegan since it was never part of an animal? If so, does a bio-printed fluffy count as synthetic meat?
Give a crazy person any well-meaning cause and they will twist it into something horrible.
oh i know, a ton of vegans are big time hypocrites that ignore human suffering of underpaid third world workers who harvest their kinoa, i meant more in the ideal principle and less on the reality of it lmao
But, and hear me out here, aren’t fluffies stupider than plants in moronbox? Wouldn’t that make eating moronbox headcanon fluffies MORE vegan than eating plants?
if we go by stupidity and willingness to be eaten, the boopco munchkins from my headcanon would fit as vegan then, since they are made to not feel pain and see everything as a game (and cow munchkins even going as far as asking “can fwuffy be hambuwgew :D?”) lol
aw man i couldnt eat something with a face and consider it a plant or whatever.
If capybaras can be fish than fluffies can be vegan
I thought “now way is that real”
It’s fucking real what.
Fluffies are vegan because they are entirely synthetic. Just like how lab meat is vegan.
Furthermore, fluffies can consent so they don’t fall under the extremely loosely explained “exploitation” argument.
In reality though, vegans wouldn’t consider fluffies vegan for the same reason figs aren’t vegan and honey isn’t vegan. The rules are dumb and can’t survive scrutiny.
I’d say no as they still consist of animal protein and as such anyone with meat allergies would become very ill were they to eat them. 
Veganism was in the beginning just having a completely plant-based diet. Then came the fanatics and wrecked havoc. Just as some don’t take allergies seriously due to some diet craze excluding things the same goes for me who can’t properly digest animal produce. A single mistake or complete lack of care can cause harm and, for some unlucky sods, even death. 
I think fluffies would eat whatever they’re teeth is strong enough to chew. From the various canon I understand a fluffies teeth aren’t sharp and they don’t have a strong jaw as they were designed to not harm a child should they decided to bite the child. With this line of thinking most veggies would be soft enough for a fluffy to eat as well as most pastas (skettis ). If it’s soft enough I think a fluffy would eat it regardless of what it is. If a mare needs “nummies fo to maek miwkies fo babbehs “ she will eat whatever she can.
The question is can fluffies be eaten under a vegan diet not if fluffies diet is vegan
I think the question is asking whether a HUMAN vegan would be able to eat a fluffy and still call it vegan. For instance, lab grown tissue sold as meat would be vegan.
Probably not, considering they were engineered with DNA from a bunch of different animals.
I’m changing my vote
@NovaUmbra Did you know clams are Vegan?
I did not before you mentioned it, but I can believe it…
@Elcucuyfeo now That is a clever answer to the question and makes me realize that a vegan fluffy would be interesting to write about OwO