Does it need to be “many”? Just a thought. Like, part of the appeal of Carpdime’s Avocado to me is that he’s capable of some smart things, though not all. I think @mutagen’s Greg from Postfluff would be capable of completing a word search - granted he’s an outlier in his setting, but that’s my point. (and I think it would be a darn shame if Greg couldn’t complete a word search) And Pep mentioned Pinkyfluffy, who did this picture. If we go by Pinkyfluffy alone, his take on fluffies and what they’re capable of is very different from typical headcanon/hivecanon. Which is why I said the statement.
Personally speaking, I like to challenge the notion. Or rather, I think people make flufies “too” dumb. I think there can be a nuance/limitations to their intelligence without going to the extreme. And I think there is also a beauty in people who don’t limit themselves in how they depict their fluffies.
And I agree on that! I think that should be done, actually! I think it’s a great idea, and it’s a shame no one has done that. Heck, I’d write that myself, but I got enough things on my backlog to do as is Dx But yes, I genuinely think that’s a great idea.
Oh, and speaking of reading, there are stories and depictions of fluffies being capable of reading to some extent. (I myself have done a few of that, though I do think fluffies would be limited in what they can read. Like picturebooks)