or which fluffy is the ugliest
5 Likes
Easy shortcut:
3 Likes
I have my own answer on this but honestly I don’t feel right that by extension I would be dragging the artist; intentional or not.
3 Likes
Pretty much. There are definitely certain artists’ styles I don’t enjoy, so I guess that would be my answer to this question, but it feels rude to say it.
2 Likes
I think ShaferAraks fluffies with their stupid bowl cuts are the ugliest and most kickable. Shafer was a genius making them in that way.
14 Likes
Yeah, shaferaraks had a quality that made you hate them
10 Likes
The key to ugliness is to add as much snot as possible. And a big nose for the snot.
2 Likes
Yeah, no, there are styles and things about a style I don’t like, that too me, make their fluffies ugly, including my own. But I’ll never say what which ones.
2 Likes
He’s referring to mine 
3 Likes
Really, but your fluffies are cute and squishy. Different tastes I guess.
4 Likes
That is a very subjective question. Especially, since I really like it when fluffies look like retarded pig-ponies which some might consider ‘ugly’. But then again I get my kicks from seeing the little critters suffer… is a legless fluffy uglier or more beautiful after having lost a few limbs? Various boxes might give you varying answers.
It also depends on art style. Some artists draw REALLY simplistically, some WAY too detailed for a fucking shitrat making them look like miniature horses, almost graceful and elegant looking. Almost.
On a related note, there is an ‘actual-horse’ tag which I find hilarious.
5 Likes
I doubt it.
Your fluffies are really expressive and cute 
7 Likes
i thought moss was talking about my fluffies
2 Likes
Shaferaraks
7 Likes
Of course not! I love your fluffs. Like Wolfram’s work they’re so wonderfully realized and drawn that I root for them despite knowing the odds are stacked against them.
4 Likes
Nope.
oh ok. should’ve guessed since I don’t draw them
1 Like