Post Deleted by Author @Rampage . Posting the link again because I’m not responsible for other people’s actions. There’s no abuse in this video, and I believe the video is edited enough to not go against site rules. Actual Mods, correct me if I’m wrong here. https://youtu.be/fBhVmDSE6u4?si=u_2oPRbkvI8EiGMU
4 Likes
Lovely!
1 Like
That kinda just looks like a real life mini horse
1 Like
And by kinda I mean it looks like a regular mini horse
2 Likes
Kinda looks rotoscoped
2 Likes
Post Deleted by Author
Post Deleted by Author
Please don’t make abuse of things that look like real world creatures. It’s against the rules for one thing. It’s probably better to keep it off the site altogether even if it’s hugbox
Post Deleted by Author
Not saying that necessarily, just saying please don’t continue this style
Sorry I wasn’t saying that this post was against the rules in particular, just that any abuse of it might be and maybe I’m wrong. I’m also just personally opinionated about it.
I’m saying abuse of things modeled accurately after real life creatures is against the rules, I think.
And then I discouraged posting hugbox too even, because people will see hugbox and make abuse about it. It’s just damned by association
Post Deleted by Author
You can knock that shit off. I’m not a mod and I’m not your mom
Quit being weird. I’m leaving
Then why’d you try to act like it? And if other people make abuse based off a non abusive animation, that’s the animator’s fault how? That’s like seeing all the fnaf r34 and saying that Scott Cawthon is personally responsible for it??
You are throwing a tantrum
How? By asking how it would be my fault if someone else made an abusive animation based off of/inspired by my non abusive animation? Honestly, sounds like you dont have a valid response to the question.
Rampage never said it would be the creators fault, just that its something likely to happen given the nature of the site. Calm down, man.
I am calm, and did you not read what they typed? Is this place like Twitter, where people can’t understand what they themselves typed? Again, how would I be personally responsible for my neutral work inspiring others to make abuse? Why am I not allowed to be creative when there are literal stories about humans having sex with shitpig ‘tard-horses on this site? Like its honestly just stupid. “Oh, a comic depicting a man raping a fluffy stallion with full uncensored cocks out on both creatures? That’s fine! But you can’t post an edited rotoscoped video of a fluffy playing with a ball! Other people might wanna abuse the edited horse video!!”
Im not going to pretend to understand the full convo here since half of it is deleted, but the main concern was that the rotoscoping made this lean towards real horses rather than fluffies. You were just advised not to make abuse content with that sort of thing or even hugbox because it could make other users feel its OK to post abuse content with things that look like plain animal abuse. Not fluffy abuse, animal abuse. That wouldnt be your fault, but given how this site is revolved around fluffies, we advise to keep things as close to fluffies as you can