Art is like anything else. Practice makes perfect (at least till as a creative, you find something else that you perceive as wrong and start trying to correct even though no one else notices it…)
You’ve got Fluffy fluffyness down in other stuff you’ve done. I think here it was more of a case of the expression you were conveying not meshing. Experimentation isn’t bad!
yeah, i spoke to my brother and plan on making rootbeer fatter in any next drawing i may do, so i can learn better from it.
i tend to see most of the ‘fluffy-ness’ in the fluffy’s face and expressions, guess i forgot how important the body proportions were too.
no clue, probably cuz i havent been here long in comparison, or since im still getting used to drawing them as my art is- not your average fluffy art stylistically
Idk why people are taking people providing critique as a bad thing, especially considering that Julie was willing to listen to it and take it in stride. That’s more than can be said for 99% of active artists.
Saying ‘that’s not a fluffy’ and ‘what’s this doing on FC’ isnt constructive criticism. Especially when the line between fluffies and ponies is so vague. Are fluffplosion’s fluffies ‘fluffies’? What about the puff fluffs, which look exactly like flufflepuff (and flufflepuff isnt a fluffy)? And what about all the fluffy variants?
Arguing over stupid shit like this is one of the things that poisoned the booru and drove off so many good artists. That is why one of the guiding rules of FC was that you dont fight over headcanon. If you dont like an artists take on fluffies, just skip them.
At least I thought that was a principle of FC, along with no racial slurs. Apparently I was wrong on both counts.
I guess it was inevitable, everything related to fluffies eventually turns into 4chan.