Shit, they rereleased the retro Tamagotchis. They even made a Pac-Man Tamagotchi.
A Fluffy Tamagotchi would be the absolute fucking shit. Full on âSHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!â
Shit, they rereleased the retro Tamagotchis. They even made a Pac-Man Tamagotchi.
A Fluffy Tamagotchi would be the absolute fucking shit. Full on âSHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!â
Honestly, if they made Fluffy Tamagotchis I would go poorer quicker than I normally do in the middle of the month.
Id be an attentive owner until they began huffing for Sketties
Here: Excerpts from Assisted Fluffy Digestion (by Chikahiro)
Got a link to yours? That sounsd interesting.
Now that I think about it, fluffies and Tamagotchis is a neat idea. Yâknow, seeing how fluffies react to Tamagotchis.
Ooh, or maybe a fluffy getting a Foalagotchi.
Too lazy to read all this, somebody summarize
Here it is for you to check out itâs not exactly Hugbox and I had this idea that people who see poor diet ideas would be likely to inflict it on fluffies
TLDR: some of us think fluffy cannibalism is good, some of us think itâs bad.
Sorry this keeps happening. I think I might just take a break from commenting altogether.
If cows knew they were so delicious theyâd ask for bbq brisket too.
I honestly wouldnât care if my tamagotchi asked me for Huggies and Milkies in public theyâre getting it as Iâd be the best owner I could be, itâs such an amazing idea.
I can imagine a fluffy would really believe that itâs a tiny animal inside.
Theyâre only Foals for like a couple of weeks, and in the standard version they die in one week either because they starve, are removed from the machine and culled, or a blade in the can severs their spine.
That, and the cost of production, is what keeps them from being profitable in any way at like$0.25 to $5.
The vending machines in Japan that sell live puppies and kittens cost $100 on average, and are a short distance from the animal shelter they come from and rotate back into if unsold. Said shelter is subsidized by the government and donations, not exactly a megacorporation profit scheme.
Most animals will conduct cannibalism to varying degrees.
I think elephants and humans are extreme outliers.
*pops in to check notifications *
*thereâs yet another ridiculously extensive debate in the comments *
Weâre nerds. Nerding. Sorry!
As a general headcannon, cannibal fluffies are meant to be fluffies but better in all ways, they are here to be the fluffies hasbio wanted fluffies to be, without all that dna degeneration.
they are meant to be pets and thus arenât meant to be let out in the wild for no other reason than hunting fluffies with an owner.
As a threat to other life, they are still considerably weaker than any other animal out there, and should pose no threat to a dog or cat, they are basically fluffies but hostile to other non-cannibal fluffies and some level of experience and training on how to kill them, basically think of them a one of the âthoughiesâ in a smarty herd but slightly buffier in all stats.
they donât pose really a threat to anything because their targets are basketball-sized living plushies with the relative resistance to damage as a shrivelled rance nugget you found behind your fridge before moving out.
In any case hasbio wanted them to be very unfertile to raise the prices of making one and thus selling one, and to not have the fluffy catastrophy if they go AWOL.
Guys can we cap off the comments here? Weâre over 40.
I can see yâall typing replies. Please take any further discussion elsewhere, I hate crowded comment threads.
I dunno, I just like cannibal fluffies because I like the horror of cannibalism. Itâs a little edgy but regular gore doesnât get to me like some psychological horror does and cannibalism has always fascinated me. Not in a âI wish to feast upon your flesh!â kinda way, more in a âwhy would someone cannibalize another person and what would be able to drive them to do it?â type of way
I can do that