They are toys but if you owned a fluffy you couldn’t treat them like a regular toy. You’d have to treat them more like a pet. They need to eat and drink and to shit and piss. And they can have babies.
It’s not the same thing as something like a doll or a Furby either, because with these things it’s just play pretend. With a fluffy there’s a lot more responsibility.
This no one wants lego minifigures that shit themselves and disobey you. Unless that’s part of the game in which case would you be playing parent or owner.
See you have no vision I have a position and I make it known your simple mind sees that and can not phantom that it is a start of a discussion not an end to one
But would that be healthy be organic kibble or actually cooked meals? Like I know for a fact that some dog’s food is much healthier than the average mom made PB&J but you’d still get odd looks if you fed your child the healthiest of Purina.
It depends, how Children are supposed to play and what the execs who designed the toy intended it to be played with are two very different things. Besides most fluffy owners are lonely adult men who buy them to break them.
You’d be surprised on how many fluffy dinners you can make with $15 dollars for rice and vegetables. More than enough than what kibble gives that’s for sure…
The question was how would you treat them if you had one, not what should they legally be defined as. You can just leave a toy lying around. But if you didn’t look after a fluffy, they’d shit everywhere, mate or starve to death.