First pic its from hard-boiled right?
4 Likes
Hells yeah.
4 Likes
Examining the evidence,it is clear that The guy who wrote this post (Anonymous31) have âwowstest poopie pwace huwtiesâ
4 Likes
Knowing that the fluffies will suffer forever makes it all worth it.
3 Likes
I know this has been here for a time, but the main take away I had from this was actually more subtle than most of the images. If the message was sincere, the artist seems to view pillowed fluffies as worthless and their lives should just be ended, because apparently they already are. Even in the drawings and text, other fluffies view them as worthless pieces of shit. Itâs as though theyâre saying, ah, someone damaged you. Welp, oh well, youâre no good now.
For me, while Iâm no hugboxer, I wouldnât really class myself as an abuser. Perhaps that makes me neutral if I can appreciate the saccharine hugbox and the horrors of abuse. Perhaps I want to see the breadth of imagination. But what I donât understand is the double standards in the piece. The abuser just randomly takes all the legs. Thatâs apparently bad. But then the only interactions the pillows have with other fluffies are negative, and thereâs no finger wagging there. I think punishments for bad behaviour are important. I think protecting innocent fluffies is the right thing to do. The punishment should fit the crime. Thatâs my viewpoint if Iâm writing. But people can write and imagine all sorts, and inspiration breeds true art.
Maybe my take is too superficial. Maybe this piece is meant to be satire or some subliminal suggestion that taking this route will lead to good psychological abuse. I guess I just donât know.
7 Likes
Doesnât seem too far off from how I label my headcanons. Remember that perceptive is different for everybody - some people are Chads, some people are Virgins, some people are hugboxers, some people are abusers. Telling whoâs who is kinda harder than just a glance.
(Also dewegging? Come the sweet fuck man - I think we got the Chad and Virgin roles reversed; cause I can do better than that)
2 Likes
Consider this:
What exactly would the means to an end for the Chad have any reason? My response? Just have fun with the fluffies. Ripping a foal in half and dewegging them bear the same means: some abusers just love to have themselves some joy.
Although, itâŚcan get much worse than that. Much worse, if nature takes itâs gamblesâŚ
3 Likes
haha ye.
2 Likes
Rserp8. It was a comment on Fluffybooru, among many others.
2 Likes
âWas it worth it?â âŚYes.
2 Likes
I feel personally attacked(jk jk not reallyoffender)-places hand on chest in shock-I dont need a reason to abuse and torture my fluffys if I want to Iâm gonna do it
1 Like
Honestly this art style is super cute! And yea, Iâm kind of against abuse. Though I wouldnât insult someone that does like it. There is a weird thing with humans called cute aggression, where they feel a desire to hurt something because itâs so cute. Usually they stays with those intrusive thoughts youâve learned to ignore. Other people will create reasons to abuse, which is what brought us smarties and hell gremlins. People have their reasons, so long as they know the difference between fictional fluffies and actual animals. Sometimes I worry fluffy abusers do it because they want to abuse animals irl.
2 Likes
bruh we are just trying to vent man
lmaoooo
Chad got it right. And Makeaccount needs to keep doing stuff. A whole monster shitload more. Masterful artist, hilarious subject matter. IMO the best contributor in the fandom at least art-wise since Gr1m1.
Me, an omega Chad Neutral boxer.
1 Like
Note to self, look up buwwitoâs artwork.
It was very worth it. Itâs their fault that they didnât use the litter box.
All i hear is hugboxer whine and very little âbased chadâ around here
Cringe
Yes it was.
I just love to see cute thing suffer.
Poop is just an excuse, if iâm bored i wonât even need 1