I was thinking in a story like a press conference made for some university’s resource team that was able to rise a new type of fluffy from Poopieh Babbehs.
The idea is simple: take the first wave and rise them giving them Horse mare milk instead the fluffy mare milk (saying that thing is poison for any living creature due that is too sweet and any rat fed with that liquid died for… Diabetes in record time), and, when the foals growth enough, feed them with real food (not sketties or Hasbio’s food), just to make them stronger and smarter but not to the point to being smarties, but real smart creatures (corrected language included).
But not sure if there is a good idea due the lore or any other thing
(Also, the investigation shows the fluffies where designed to die in the most painful and agonizing way due their anatomy, something that should kill any creature like a poison in a few seconds with minimum pain, fluffies suffered a lot and take a lot of time).
This would completely defeat the point of fluffies. They’re not meant to be rebuilt around superior genetics, learned knowledge, or strengthened through some superficial program. They are and have always been genetically engineered as dependent upon humans and caretakers. Their existence hinges on humanity at all times. To remove this feature would be to completely remove the concept of fluffy from fluffies.
In essence it completely breaks the mold of what has been laid out for the entirety of fluffies as a community, spanning multiple years and numerous websites. The basis of fluffies as a creature are meant to be recognized as insufficient for continued independent existence. That’s why there’s dozens of stories that focus on nature-vs-fluffies, as well as abuse narratives. Not to mention all of the bleakbox and sadbox that encompasses this narrative line. To deviate in any form or function would break this well crafted mold that has been central to the basis of the fluffy community, itself.
Nobody wants fluffies to be fixed. If you do a “fixing the fluffy” story, then it should only exist to show how altering fluffies in a positive way could only do more harm to them than good. Fluffies are interesting because they are horribly broken and mismatched creatures, and taking that away would rob them of what gives a fluffy their “soul”.
So you want to make fluffies non-retarded by feeding them an all organic diet…a plan which requires them to be poopie babbehs because…?
I don’t know what is with people, particularly new people, wanting to fix fluffies. Like if you don’t like them how they are, why are you here? If you wanted a non-retarded pony, there’s a bunch of MLP sites. Choose one, go there, write fan fiction where Pinkie Pie is your housepet and you feed her carrots or something. Fluffies are unique because of how fucked in the head they are. They are broken, innocent, horribly stupid and unapologetically awful at just about anything they attempt to do. Fixing them is in complete opposition to what makes them special in the first place.
Ok ok, I catch it. Do not try to create a perfect species from flufflies… Except if the perfect species make an holocaust and almost extinct the retarded basterds… Fluffy basterds.
There are two sides to this place ,fluffies are either little beings of love in a world that hates them ,or selfish little beings who get what they deserve ,what both sides agree on is that fluffies are inherently useless ,pathetic and short-legged.
And the legs is not a joke, we take it very seriously, we do not want ponies (with exceptions but as they say you must understand well how something works to break the mold well). We want beings that their gait is less like an elegant trot and more like the wobble of an overweight dachshund.
Maybe we need a story about a scientist/breeder obsessed with turning fluffies into intelligent creatures the size of a miniature horse. They can even perform leg-lengthening surgery on them, use plastic surgery to raise their crotch boobs to their chests, put them on an IV of adderall and immodium, and finally, surgically fix their mouths to be more human-like so they can speak more clearly. Oh yeah, and get rid of all the fur.
I’m sure it wouldn’t turn into an abomination at all.
If it’s the story I’m thinking of, the mother was using the fluffy as a surrogate for her own dead child and deliberately kept it isolated from everything so it wouldn’t realise it was a fluffy. That plan failed and the woman killed the fluffy, forcing her to start again with a new one.
There’s two other series that I know of, both with a single mother using a fluffy as a surrogate for a lost child. One is a sadbox and the human sister loves the fluffy as if it was an younger sister; the other is a revenge story where the human daughter uses the help of a local fluffy expert she befriended, to turn the fluffy into a spoilt brat, causing the mother to prove that she’s unfit to have custody of her so she can move in with her father.
Wait, you think their lisp is caused by their diet?
Wait, you think sketties aren’t real food?? What are they meant to eat, cabbage and potatoes?
Anyway, don’t forget the original in-universe purpose of fluffies: Children’s toys. They weren’t designed to die, they were made to be harmless to children and capable of withstanding said childrens’ antics, with their helplessness (and weird amount of resistance to death by poison etc) being a side effect.
Hm, read I read this, the comic of a woman who lost her kid and used a foal-in-a-can as a replacement. Basically trying to rise him as a ‘human’. Can’t remember the name of it for the life of me.
You’ll find you get harsh replies to this because similar things have been asked and attempted before, but still thank you for asking. A lot of people have the same thoughts as you when they join - what if this or that detail were different? But changing too much about the central idea of fluffies just makes them not feel like fluffies any more.
Have a read of some of the stories on here and see if they help you to get the idea of the different reasons people enjoy fluffies as they are. One reason is “cuteness aggression”, for example, and another is satirising the ways people treat (and mistreat) their pets in the real world. There’s sure to be some angle that you’ll enjoy.